Thursday, September 29, 2011

The TRUE CHRISTIAN

  BAPTIST CHRISTIAN ASSEMBLY
            ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          WE SEEK TO PUT EVERYTHING UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF GOD

What Is a True Christian?

How to discern True Christianity from False Doctrine

1. True Christianity must line up with the Bible, the word of God. True Christianity pronounces Jesus Christ to be the Son of God and believes that He is the only way to salvation and forgiveness.
2. True Christianity will be rejected by the vast majority. This has always been the case throughout history. In Noah's time only 8 people were saved in the whole world. In Lot's time only Lot and his family were saved in two cities. The Bible says that our time will be similar to Noah and Lot's time so it is very likely that the percentage of people saved could be similar.
3. True Christianity will be considered radical by most people. Jesus, the apostles and the prophets were considered radical. The Bible says that Christians are a peculiar people.
4. True Christianity will boldly rebuke and hate evil to such a large extent that those who preach the truth will greatly upset those who are evil. Those who preach truth will suffer persecution as a result.
5. True Christianity will be controversial and cause divisions (Luke 12: 51,52). To cause these divisions major change would have to occur in someone's life which would upset others.
6. True Christianity will testify that almost everything that almost everyone does is evil.
7. True Christianity will be about true love, which is sharing and caring for others, where the main focus is to proclaim or aid the proclamation of the Gospel.
8. True Christianity will not be conformed to the world by accepting or desiring materialism, money and commercialism as a good thing or a part of life.
9. True Christianity will not be able to be proved wrong, although people may appear to make it sound untrue by arguing against it by using false statements.
10. True Christianity will not be deceptive or misleading or cause people to believe a lie. It will be about honesty and truth. People today are saying misleading things such as  

that the church is fine. They say that people are getting healed everywhere and saying that they are healed when they are not. This could be compared to a dishonest salesman who says something is great when it does not work in order to get people to accept their product or system.
11. True Christianity is positive about good things and doing God's will, but it hates evil. It is not like the mainstream that is positive about many evil things. Saying that something evil is good is only leading people to do evil. Many people say that things are fine and that many people are being saved and doing God's will when this is not true. This is only suppressing the fact that the world is almost totally evil and causing people not to repent.
12. True Christianity has the fruits of commitment to doing God's will and it will follow the historical example of those who did God's will such as Jesus, the Apostles and the Prophets. Using your time and money to do God's will is the purpose of life. The majority don't do God's will by working for the corrupt system or spending their money and time on unnecessary things.
Where does this leave the mainstream Church and the millions of people who think they are Christians. Although the mainstream churches have a lot of true Bible teaching, it appears that they probably will not fit into the category of the minority of saved believers. Therefore, they may be rejected and considered lukewarm if they don't repent.
The Bible promises that God will help His chosen people who obey Him by answering their prayers and leading them. However, curses are promised to people that disobey God. (Duet 28). Obedient people should therefore receive a greater percentage of desirable outcomes and a lower percentage of undesirable outcomes than the ungodly. God should help His people to think or work more efficiently, remember better, make the correct decisions, and find what they need with less frustrating problems, inconveniences or accidents than unbelievers. Please let me know if you know of anyone who can produce the evidence that they are obviously led and helped by God so that the result cannot be explained by imagination and the laws of probability. I know that the Bible promises trials and persecution, but it indicates that there should be divine help as well, as explained attruechristianity.com .
There are many debatable doctrines that I am not sure of. However, I am willing to believe and practice them if someone can show me and produce the evidence that these doctrines are what God really wants us to believe. If someone is obviously led and helped by God as explained in the previous paragraph, there would be a good chance that their beliefs would be fully correct. We are yet to meet anyone who can produce the evidence that God is pleased with them and helping them.

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

The FREEMASONRY EXPOSED


The 700 Club EXPOSED!
by David J. Stewart
700 Club Psychics? Clairvoyants for Jesus?
I generally don't care much for religious programs. However, knowing that millions of people are attracted to such programs, I find myself compelled to see exactly what people are being dished out by these so-called "Christians." I've been watching The 700 Club lately, analyzing it, and I see Satan at work. I see them as borderline psychics, who exploit Christianity to make money and con people. 
On the show, Gordon Robertson and Terry Meeuwsen regularly join hands in a prayer segment, which is then followed by a psychic type reading, where they specify details of who is being healed in TV land. It's creepy! Are The 700 Club hosts, Pat Robertson, Gordon Robertson and Terry Meeuwsen, psychics?  On today's show, Gordon and Terry prayed while holding hands, and then claimed that the following healings had taken place as a result of their prayers on TV ...
  • Someone with an "abscessed right tooth," has just now been healed. 
  • Someone with "twisted intestines" has just been healed.
  • Then Terry said there was a person with a "strange condition," a burning in the legs, who has just been healed.
  • Then Gordon said there's a man with swelling of the sinuses in his right cheek, with much pain behind the right eye, but he is now healed.
  • Someone with a painful right elbow joint no longer has any pain.
  • Someone with a problematic right hip, limited mobility from a stroke, is now able to walk.
  • Terry said she saw someone with severe stiffness in the neck bone, but didn't know the exact ailment--that person is now healed, terry said.
  • Someone paralyzed on the right side, particularly the right side of the face, has just been healed.
  • A man with a plate in his skull is having continual problems, and the doctors just don't know what to do.  Terry said she saw the bone reforming around the plate and the man's pain was gone, he was now healed.
These are the crazy and absurd claims of these so-called "Christians." As I listened to their bizarre claims, I wrote them down, as listed above. How can they claim to see such healings? Folks, this is CLAIRVOYANCE (i.e., Apparent power to perceive things that are not present to the senses), and is exactly what the Satanic psychics do!!! How in the world would Gordon Robertson and Terry Meeuwsen know who is being healed? How can you see someone's bone reforming inside their head? The Word of God never teaches any such demonic practice. 
I dare you to show me from the Bible, where God said he would give us some mystical power of being able to see or know what is going on in someone else's body. It is extremely dangerous to dabble in familiar spirits. The hosts of The 700 Club are leading the public to believe that they have some special power with God, the ability to see who is being healed. They do not! It is a psychological scam to seduce suffering people into giving The 700 Club more money. And it works! The Christians Broadcasting Network (CBN) took in $160,000,000 in 2005 alone!

Donations rise 21% for Robertson’s TV ministry
Pat Robertson
Pat Robertson 

 
By STEVEN G. VEGH , The Virginian-Pilot
© March 21, 2006

VIRGINIA BEACH — Pat Robertson’s television ministry continues to ride a wave of ever-mounting contributions, which have almost doubled in less than a decade.
Donors gave $160 million to Robertson’s Christian Broadcasting Network, according to tax statements for the year ending in March 2005, an increase of 21 percent from the previous year. Contributions to CBN have increased steadily since 1997, when it received $84 million, filings with the Internal Revenue Service show.
Donations from viewers and supporters account for most of the network’s overall revenue of $236 million.
SOURCE

Pat Robertson Estimated to be Worth $150-200 million!
"Robertson lives on the top of a Virginia mountain, in a huge mansion with a private airstrip. He owns the Ice Capades, a small hotel, diamond mines (in Zaire), a vitamin company (Kalo Vita) involved in a multi-level marketing scheme along the lines of Amway, and until recently, International Family Entertainment, parent company of the Family Channel (see below) -- all estimated to be worth between $150-200 million. How does a televangelist, who is supposedly involved in non-profit work, manage to create such a fortune for himself? One thing is known for sure, Robertson's numerous private business interests have at times pushed their expenses onto the tax-exempt, religious interests of CBN. For example, Robertson was caught using CBN money and equipment to aid his diamond mining operation -- a double good deal for Pat, seeing as he employed people in Zaire for ridiculously low wages, and managed to use CBN's infrastructure to cut costs even more. In looking at Robertson's businesses, one is struck by the constant use of non-profit, donor money to fund his schemes. (For documentation of this and more, see Rob Boston's book entitled The Most Dangerous Man in America?: Pat Robertson and the Rise of the Christian Coalition.)" -SOURCE

Pat Robertson Supported by Coors Beer!
Pat Robertson Mum on Liquor Curse Because of Lush Contribution from Coors Brewing Company!
Many will be shocked and saddened by the published statement of Pat Robertson that among his biggest contributors are Joseph and Holly Coors, beer brewing tycoons.
When asked at the Religious Newswriters Association (after addressing them, in Atlanta), what he thought about the morality of the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages, Robertson replied, "I cannot afford to say anything about that."
Then, the Christian television executive gave the reason why: "Joseph and Holly Coors of the Golden(Colorado) family, are among my strongest supporters. They are very beautiful people and very dear friends – so I cannot afford to say anything about that."
It is a dark day in America when the Dollar Sign neutralizes and destroys the influence of Christian leaders. It is no wonder that the damnable liquor traffic is so firmly entrenched in our country. And what a tragic day that will be when some of these leaders stand before God! (Source of information in this report: The National Statesman Magazine).
~ The Capital Voice

We read in James 5:15 that "the prayer of faith shall save the sick"; BUT, we also read the Apostle Paul's words in 2nd Timothy 4:20, "...but Trophimus have I left at Miletum sick."  Clearly, whatever "gift" of healing Paul had back in Acts 28:3-6 when he was bitten by a deadly snake was GONE.  Paul couldn't heal his friend Trophimus.  Also, Paul couldn't heal his co-laborer in the Lord, Timothy, as Paul mentions Timothy's "often infirmities" (1st Timothy 5:23).  God does NOTguarantee healing just because we pray; BUT, God does tell us to pray for the sick, and then trust His wisdom, goodness, and judgment.  Our responsibility is to pray and wait upon the Lord.  It is sinful and unbiblical for ANYONE to claim a "right" to be healed, or to teach others that God always heals the sick.  As we clearly see in the Bible, God doesn't always heal the sick.
The Bible states in Isaiah 53:5, "But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed."  Some foolish people twist this Scripture around to claim that Jesus died to pay for our physical healing too, and that physical healing as guaranteed by Jesus' blood.  However, this interpretation is clearly erroneous in lieu of the Bible verses I've just shared with you.  Just because we are Christians does not guarantee us health, wealth, or prosperity in this sinful world.  Romans 6:23 proclaims "For the wages of sin is death..."  The physical death is inevitable, because our sins bring death.  However, we do not have to die the second death in the Lake of Fire because Christ offers us the free gift of eternal life through faith in Him alone.  No amount of prayer guarantees physical or mental healing.  The only guarantee we have is concerning Heaven, "For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved" -Romans 10:13.
 
Exploiting the Gospel
So many con artists and false prophets are exploiting the Gospel nowadays.  As you will read in the section below, something is very phony about Pat Robertson.  It is obvious to the educated Christian, that Satan requires allegiance from those who would become the most successful in this world.  This is not surprising as the Bible exposes Satan as the god of this world (i.e., the god of the wicked and unsaved).  This is why we see open allegiance to Satan in so much music today, such as the Rolling Stones' blasphemous song, SYMPATHY FOR THE DEVIL.  This allegiance is also seen in thecorporate world.  And tragically, it is also seen in the religious world...
Benny Hinn
Benny Hinn
Jesse Duplantis
Jesse Duplantis
Kenneth Copeland
Kenneth Copeland

Pat Robertson Displays Satanic 'El Diablo' Sign During 700 Club Show

So-called Christian voice of America also soft-peddles big brother surveillance society
Pat Robertson, the so-called voice of Christian America, has again been caught 'El Diablo red handed' flashing occult and satanic hand signals during his show.
During Thursday morning's 700 Club program Robertson could clearly be seen displaying the El Diablo hand gesture towards the end of the broadcast.
To fans of UT football El Diablo simply means 'Hook 'em Horns' but it is also used by Satanists as a form of communication.
The gesture represents the horned devil, also known as the sign of Il Cornuto and Diabolicus and was fully embraced by modern day Satanic cults. It is now seen as a trendy thing to do amongst heavy metal and Goth fans. They see it as a sign of rebellion against the establishment, which couldn't be further from the truth.
Headlines were made last year during Bush's inauguration when the President and his family repeatedly flashed the sign. US media brushed aside the matter, saying it was in the context of supporting UT Longhorns. However, Europeans were shocked and interpreted the gesture as a salute to Satan.
Here is a still of Robertson flashing the signal. Click here for a video montage of the show, which includes Roberts' comments on biometric finger scanning to enter schools and the big brother society, an issue we will explore later.
Robertson talks about feeling heat and fire and utters 'Jesus' under his breath moments before he flashes the sign. This is in the context of Robertson trying to relay power from 'his God' to heal his supporters' physical ailments.
First of all it is necessary to remind ourselves of Robertson's previous decidedly un-Christian activities.
In April 2001 Robertson supported China's brutal policy of forced abortion and said that the Communist country was "doing what they have to do" in keeping population numbers down. It is not Christian to advocate even voluntary abortion on the part of the mother, never mind such a tyrannical model of forced abortion as part of a wider eugenics agenda.
Whenever the subject of implantable chips has been raised on the 700 Club, Robertson has whitewashed the issue, saying that it doesn't represent the mark of the beast and that Christians should not be concerned about it. This directly contradicts the Bible and Revelations.
Earlier this year Robertson caused waves when he advocated the assassination of Venezuelan populist president Hugo Chavez. In doing so Robertson is nailing his colors to the wall as a firm minion of the New World Order. Chavez has rallied against the Globalists at every turn, including his recent spat with Vincente Fox and his rejection of the FTAA.
Returning to the El Diablo hand gesture, should it worry us that other Christian preachers have also been photographed flashing the sign? Texe Marrs has been instrumental in bringing this to light and some examples from his book Codex Magica can be seen below.
The gesture was embraced by Satanic cults and the Church of Satan's leader Anton LaVey as seen below.
A collage of other examples of politicians and media personalities flashing the symbol can be found on this page.
We do not claim that every example is evidence that the person worships Satan but there is enough material to indicate that something very disturbing is taking place.
Even if you don't believe in good and evil or God and Satan, the elitists do. Bohemian Grove and Skull and Bones are proof that the elite think that engaging in occult practices enhances their power. We did not set out to connect the occult with the Globalists' overall agenda, it just seems that they converge every time we look at it.
Experts in the occult have come to the conclusion that flashing the El Diablo sign is an attempt on the part of the individual to draw further power from 'their God' because the Globalists are losing their influence over world events and the natural yearning for truth and liberty is stalling their agenda.
Here is another photo of Pat Robertson giving an occult gesture, this time the Masonic Sign of Fellow Craft, or the Devil's Claw, in a front page photo shoot for Time Magazine on February 17th 1986.
We will now move on to discuss Robertson's comments on big brother and the surveillance society.
Even if you disbelieve all the evidence about hand gestures and occultism, Robertson's advocacy of a high tech slave grid should have everyone worried.
Robertson is asked for his response to a mother who is concerned about her child's school instituting biometric finger scanners. Robertson states,
"Like it or not big brother is on your case all the time and we're gonna have our eyes, the iris scanned, all kinds of things these days for identification to make sure you're not some bad guy with a bomb."
"I really don't think that that's terribly intrusive to have somebody have a scan of their finger anymore than it is to ask for fingerprints."
"I don't think you'd have much success in convincing anybody that was too much intrusion."
Since when did we all become criminals, guilty until proven innocent? Since when did children have to scan their finger like felons to enter their school?
How is an action that is associated with criminals not an intrusion?
If Jesus had lived in an age of technology should he have been made to finger scan to kick the money changers out of the temple? It wouldn't have happened because Jesus would have been treated like one of those "bad guys with a bomb."
Robertson's agenda is clear, he is trying to switch off the concerns of mainstream Christian America to the expanding Orwellian surveillance society. Robertson directly contradicts the Bible and every commonly understood Christian value.
Robertson misrepresents the very ethic of what it means to be a Christian. This only succeeds in demonizing Christianity as a whole and turning people away from faith.
Christians should take a long hard considered look at Robertson's penchant for flashing Satanic symbology and support of forced abortion. Non-Christians should be alarmed by his bloodthirsty willingness to kill and his total disregard of the bill of rights, privacy and freedom in America.
We are deeply concerned about the whole gannet of Robertson's actions and will continue to expose him for the fake Pharisee Christian, George Bush New World Order worshipping, arrogant hypocrite that he is.

 Secret Societies and The Christian Establishment
by Texe Marrs
In 1996, Time magazine, an Illuminist-puppet publication, arranged for Televangelist Pat Robertson to signal to insiders everywhere his fierce Masonic allegiance and loyalty.
Pat Robertson’s father, Senator Absalom Willis Robertson, a Democrat, was a fabulously wealthy Illuminist insider. The elder Robertson was Chairman of the U. S. Senate’s powerful Committee on Banking and Currency and later served as a "consultant" to the World Bank.

Evangelist/Zionist Author Tim LaHaye has been given large sums of money by occultist Reverend Sun Myung Moon. LaHaye has been a featured speaker at Moon’s conferences. LaHaye is a racist hater of Arabs and a fanatical supporter of Israeli Zionist aggression. He supports the unscriptural heresy of Jewish racial supremacy.
The late J. Peter Grace, head of the North American division of the secretive Catholic Order, the Knights of Malta, was the early mentor of evangelist Pat Robertson. Robertson was sent down to Brazil by the elite to get some seasoning and later was trained for his "role" as a TV evangelist at an Illuminati-sponsored church in New York City.

Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker—When their "PTL" broadcasting empire fell, it turned out that a Jewish Orthodox billionaire in Canada secretly owned all the PTL assets and property. In prison, convict Jim Bakker, ordained by the Assembly of God denomination, reportedly went to a Catholic priest to confess his sins.
The Illuminati elite saw to it that favored "pretty boy," Ralph Reed, was appointed by Pat Robertson to be head of the Christian Coalition. More recently, Reed was given millions by Republicans as a Washington, D.C. political consultant. In 2004, Reed attended the annual conclave of the prestigious Bilderbergers in Stresa, Italy. Time magazine, on its cover, May 15, 1995, anointed Reed with the telling title, "The Right Hand of God."

Paul Crouch, TBN founder, was outed by the Los Angeles Times as a homosexual.
Charismatic "name it and claim it" man Kenneth Copeland, reputed to be a high-level Mason, is shown here in an ad from his magazine.

Henry Luce, Illuminist and Order of Skull & Bones initiate, supervised and helped fund one of Billy Graham’s first crusades in New York City. The Illuminati have long worked behind the scenes to influence and control the Christian establishment. (Right: the U.S. Postal Service honored Luce with his image on a 32¢ stamp.)
CNN founder Ted Turner, shown here with actress Jane Fonda, reportedly helped Pat Robertson with setting up his CBN TV empire. Later, Turner publicly labeled Christians "losers and Bozos."

Ted Turner and UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan.
The Crystal Cathedral’s Reverend Robert Schuller, 33rd degree Mason, shares a clearly Masonic handshake with former Soviet Communist Party boss, Mikhail Gorbachev. Gorbachev, an initiate of the Grand Orient Lodge, Paris, France, spoke at Schuller’s church.

Oral Roberts, heretical charismatic faith healer, is a 33rd degree Mason, and a lodge brother of his close friend, Billy Graham.
Masonic bigwig Mikhail Gorbachev, who endorses a United Nations of Religions organization, was Time’s "Man of the Year." Gorby was given tens of thousands of dollars to speak at Oral Roberts University, a school run by his esteemed lodge brother (33rd degree) Oral Roberts.

Arno Froese, dispensationalist prophecy teacher and rabid Zionist who despises Palestinians, was guest speaker at an Israeli fundraiser. Froese’s group solicited millions of dollars from deceived Christians which went to Israeli hospitals, even though that nation’s hospitals perform abortions and are flush with money from Israel’s government-funded socialized medicine system. (Note the medical serpent logo on the podium.)
Jerry Falwell has taken money from Reverend Moon and also was given a "gift" of a multimillion-dollar executive jet aircraft by the Zionist government of Israel. Falwell is one of America’s chief propagandists for Israel and for Zionist imperial ambitions. He is a racist who hates Arabs while promoting Jewish racial supremacy.

After faith healer Benny Hinn was exposed as a fraud by various TV news programs, the Reverend Jerry Falwell came to his rescue. He invited Hinn to Falwell’s Liberty University where Falwell told people he endorsed Hinn. Both Hinn and Falwell are radical pro-Israel supporters. Israel’s Prime Minister rewarded Falwell with a spanking, new executive jet aircraft, paid for with U.S. taxpayer dollars—foreign aid given to Israel by Washington, D.C.!
Christian celebrity Pat Boone, whose heavy metal rock album "No More Mr. Nice Guy" is shown here, was on hand at a 2001 Reverend Moon "interfaith prayer" event.

Billy Graham shared a secret Masonic handshake with fellow 33rd degree Mason, former President Harry Truman.
Assembly of God leader Mike Evans, shown with Israel Prime Minister Menachem Begin. Evans was later forced to flee the nation of Cambodia after mobs threw rocks and tried to kill him at one of his crusades. The Cambodians were invited to see "miracles" of healing, but when they found out Evans was a faker and a hoax, they were outraged.

Super-rich elitist William Randolph Hearst, Catholic Knights of Malta high-up, told his national newspaper chain to "puff" Billy Graham and make him a household name.
The late Catholic Bishop Fulton J. Sheen was a popular personality on TV in the 50s. A covert member of the Masonic Lodge, his lodge brother, Reverend Robert Schuller, honored Sheen by erecting a statue of him. The statue stands now at Schuller’s Crystal Cathedral Church in California.
NOTE: Texe Marrs exposes the sinister involvement of famous-name "Christian" leaders in secret societies and Illuminist groups and reveals the horror of the Great Apostasy in his newest video:
Tower of Infamy—The Illuminati, Secret Societies, Reverend Moon, and the Buying and Selling of Televangelists and Other Famous-Name Christian Leaders

Pat Robertson is of the Devil ... Praises Pope John Paul II!

"Pat Robertson Comments on Pope John Paul II's Passing

CBN.com – VIRGINIA BEACH, Va., April 02, 2005 -- I am deeply grieved as a great man passes from this world to his much deserved eternal reward. John Paul II has been the most beloved religious leader of our age – far surpassing in popular admiration the leader of any faith.
He has been a man of great warmth, profound understanding, deep spirituality, and indefatigable vigor. It was my great honor to meet with him at the residence of my good friend, Cardinal O’Connor, in New York, and to sit in the Consistory during the mass he conducted in Central Park. I told him at the time how much the American people loved him, and he merely smiled. That love was shared not only in America but by millions all over the globe.
He has been a steady bridge in the transition of Eastern Europe from communism to freedom. His personal magnetism brought together all Christians in new bonds of understanding.
I pray for the Cardinals of the Catholic Church that they might have God-given wisdom in selecting the successor to this great man. Their task will not be easy, but with God all things are possible." -SOURCE
According to Pat Robertson, the Pope is a man of "deep spirituality."  You've got to be kidding Mr. Robertson.  And you call yourself a "Christian"?  The Pope is the leader of the biggest false religion in the world, Catholicism!  For Robertson to speak such gleaming words of praise towards such a Satanic imposter as the Pope, reveals that Robertson is in league with the Devil himself.  No born again Christian who loves the Lord would ever praise the Pope, who is leading one billion people straight into Hell.  Pat Robertson praises the Pope because he'd be off TV very fast if he criticized the Pope.  Satan uses man's love of money to control the world.  Pat Robertson has sold out to Satan!
 
Conclusion
Clearly, Pat Robertson is not what he appears to be.  So many false prophets are hiding behind the Gospel nowadays.  I looked over www.cbn.com and couldn't find a Gospel presentation anywhere.  Although they give a basic Gospel presentation on their show, they fail to explain what it really means Biblically.  Every unsaved Catholic believes the good news (Gospel) that Jesus died, was buried, and rose again three days later.  Obviously a person is not saved just because they claim to believe the Gospel.  If this were true, then EVERY Catholic, Jehovah's Witness, Christian Scientist, Mormon, and Seventh-Day Adventist is saved.  The truth is that none of them are saved.  The truth is that the Biblical Gospel EXCLUDES all self-righteousness, works, forsaking of sins, commitments, sacraments, church membership, making Jesus your Lord, walking down a church isle, giving your all to Christ, living for God, baptism, etc, etc, etc.  The only way to be saved is by faith ALONE in Jesus Christ.  We do good works BECAUSE we are already saved, not to get saved (Romans 3:20; 4:3-5). 
Pat Robertson and his The 700 Club are bad news.  They are exploiting the Gospel, Christianity, the poor, the ignorant, and suffering people, to get rich ... filthy rich.  You'll NEVER hear anyone on the show state that GOOD WORKS are a road to Hell if you rely upon them to save you; BUT, that is the Gospel truth!  Oh sure, they'll say that you can't merit Heaven; but they won't condemn Baptismal Regeneration or Lordship Salvation.  It's time for God's children to speak aloud against the damnable heresies of our day.  It may not be politically correct nowadays to outright criticize false prophets and heretics; BUT, it is Biblical, and pleasing to God (Psalm 94:16; Ephesians 5:11).


Wednesday, August 31, 2011

From My DESK

KAILAN NAGING TAMA ANG MALI?
 Marami ngayon sa mga tao kapag sabihin mo sa kanila kung ano ang tama ay hindi na nila ito pakikinggan, lalung-lalo na kapag meron na silang mga pinaniniwalaang mga kung tawagin natin
"SALIGANG ARAL"
 Marami sa mga protestanteng samahan ngayon ay buong akala na ang kanilang Linggo (Sunday) na panambahan ay s'yang inaayunan ng Bibliya.. ang sumusunod ay Testimonya ng 
THE CATHOLIC VIRGINIAN...atin po itong pansining mabuti:



WHO CHANGED THE SABBATH
FROM SATURDAY TO SUNDAY?

The Roman Catholic Church

No such law in the Bible "Nowhere" in the bible do we find that Jesus or the apostles ordered that the Sabbath be changed from Saturday to Sunday. We have the commandment of God given to Moses to keep holy the Sabbath day, that is, the Seventh day of the week, Saturday. Today, all Christians keep Sunday because it has been revealed to us by the [Roman] church outside the Bible." Catholic Virginian, Oct. 3, 1947 

"You may read the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, and you will not find a single line authorizing the sanctification of Sunday. The Scriptures enforce the religious observance of Saturday, a day which we never sanctified." James Cardinal Gibbons, The Faith of Our Fathers (1917 ed.), pp.72,73 

"If protestants would follow the Bible, they should worship God on the Sabbath Day, that is Saturday. In keeping Sunday they are following a law of the Catholic Church." Albert Smith, chancellor of the Archdiocese of Baltimore, replying for the cardinal in a letter of Feb. 10, 1920. 

"Have you not any other way of proving that the Church has power to institute festivals of precept?" 
"Had she not such power, she could not have done that in which all modern religionists agree with her, she could not have substituted the observance of Sunday, the first day of the week, for the observance of Saturday, the Seventh day, a change for which there is no Scriptural authority" Stephen Keenan, A Doctrinal Catechism 3rd ed. p. 174 

How prove you that the Church hath power to command feasts and holydays? 
By the very act of changing the Sabbath into Sunday, which Protestants allow of; and therefore they fondly contradict themselves, by keeping Sunday strictly, and breaking most other feasts commanded by the same Church." Henry Tuberville, An Abridgment of the Christian Doctrine (1833 approbation), p.58 (Same statement in Manual of Christian Doctrine, ed. by Daniel Ferris [1916 ed.], p.67) 

"The Catholic Church,... by virtue of her divine mission, changed the day from Saturday to Sunday. 
" The Catholic Mirror, official organ of Cardinal Gibbons, Sept. 23, 1893. 

"Is Saturday the 7th day according to the Bible and the 10 Commandments?" 
"I answer yes". 
"Is Sunday the first day of the week and did the Church change the 7th day, Saturday, for Sunday, the 1st day?" 
"I answer yes". 
"Did Christ change the day?" 
"I answer no!" Faithfully yours, "J. Cardinal Gibbons" Gibbons' autograph letter. 

Some theologians have held that God likewise directly determined the Sunday as the day of worship in the NEW LAW, that he himself has explicitly substituted Sunday for the Sabbath. 

But this theory is entirely abandoned. It is now commonly held that God simply gave His church the power to set aside whatever day or days she would deem suitable as holy days. The church chose Sunday, the first day of the week, and in the course of time added other days as holy days." 
John Laux A Course in Religion for Catholic High Schools and Academies 1936, vol.1 p.51 

Which is the Sabbath day? 
SATURDAY is the Sabbath day. 
Why do we observe Sunday instead of Saturday? 
We observe Sunday instead of Saturday because the Catholic Church transferred the solemity from Saturday to Sunday." 
Peter Geiermann, The Convert's Catechism of Catholic Doctrine (1946 ed.), p.50. Geiermann received the "apostolic blessing" of Pope Pius X on his labors, January 25, 1910. 

"The Catholic Church changed the observance of the Sabbath to Sunday by right of the divine, infallible authority given to her by her Founder, Jesus Christ. The Protestant, claiming the Bible to be the only guide of faith, has no warrant for observing Sunday. 

In this matter the Seventh Day Adventist is the only consistent Protestant. The Catholic Universe Bulletin, Aug. 14, 1942, p.4 

"The observance of Sunday by the Protestants is an homage they pay, in spite of themselves, to the authority of the [Catholic] church." Monsignor Louis Segur, Plain Talk About the Protestantism of Today (1868), p. 213 

Exodus 20: 8-11, 
(8) Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. (9) Six days shalt thou labor and do all thy work: (10) But the Seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: (11) For in six days the Lord made the heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the Seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day, and hallowed it. 

Colossians 2:8 warns us to: 
Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ. 

What power has claimed authority to change God's law? 
The Papacy in Rome. 
"The Pope is of so great authority and power that he can modify, explain, or interpret even Divine Laws...The Pope can modify divine law, since his power is not of man, but of God, and he acts as vicegerent of God upon earth." Translated from Lucius Ferraris, Prompta Bibliotheca (Ready Library), "Papa", art. 2. 

What part of the law of God has the papacy thought to change? 
The Fourth Commandment. 
"Catholics alledge the change of the Sabbath into the Lord's day, contrary, as it seemeth, to the Decalogue; and they have no example more in their mouth than the change of the Sabbath. They will needs have to be very great, because it hath dispensed with a precept of the Decalogue." The Augsburg Confession (Lutheran), part 2, art. 7, in Philip Schaff, The Creeds of Christendom (Harper), vol. 3, p. 64. 

"It [the Roman Catholic Church] reversed the Fourth Commandment by doing away with the Sabbath of God's word and instituting Sunday as a holiday." N. Summerbell, History of the Christian Church (1873), p. 415. 

Does the papacy acknowledge changing the Sabbath? 
It does. 
The Catechismus Romanus was commanded by the Council of Trent and published by the Vatican Press, by order of Pope Pius V, in 1566. This catechism for priests says: "It pleased the church of God, that the religious celebration of the Sabbath day should be transferred to 'the Lord's day. Sunday.'" Catechism of the Council of Trent (Donovan's translation, 1867), part 3, chap. 4, p. 345. The same in slightly different wording, is in the McHugh and Callan translation (1937 ed.), p. 402. 

Do Catholic authorities acknowledge that there is no command in the bible for santification of Sunday? 
They do. 
"You may read the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, and you will not find a single line authorizing the sanctification of Sunday. The Scriptures enforce the religious observance of Saturday, a day which we never sanctify." James Cardinal Gibbons, The Faith of Our Fathers (1917 ed.), pp. 72,73. 

How did Sunday observance originate? 
As a voluntary celebration of the Resurrection, a custom without pretense of Divine authority. 

Matthew 28:1 KJV States clearly that Christ Rose on the Sabbath Saturday!! IN the END of the Sabbath, as it began to Dawn TOWARD the FIRST day of the week, came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulcher. Mat 28:6 He is not here: for he is RISEN, as he said. Come, see the place where the Lord lay. 

Who first enjoined Sunday keeping by law? 
Constantine the Great. 
"The earliest recognition of the observance of Sunday as a legal duty is a constitution of Constantine in 321 A.D., enacting that all courts of justice, inhabitants of towns, and workshops were to be at rest on Sunday (venerabili die solis), with an exception in favor of those engaged in agricultural labor." Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th ed., art. "Sunday". 

By what church council was the observance of the seventh day forbidden and Sunday observance enjoined? 
The Council of Laodicea, in Asia Minor, fourth century. 
What kind of worship does the Saviour call that which is not according to God's commandments? 
"But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrine the commandments of men." Matt. 15:9 

Roman Catholic and Protestant Confessions about Sunday

The vast majority of Christian churches today teach the observance of Sunday, the first day of the week, as a time for rest and worship. Yet it is generally known and freely admitted that the early Christians observed the seventh day as the Sabbath. How did this change come about?
History reveals that it was decades after the death of the apostles that a politico-religious system repudiated the Sabbath of Scripture and substituted the observance of the first day of the week. The following quotations, all from Roman Catholic sources, freely acknowledge that there is no Biblical authority for the observance of Sunday, that it was the Roman Church that changed the Sabbath to the first day of the week.
In the second portion of this booklet are quotations from Protestants. Undoubtedly all of these noted clergymen, scholars, and writers kept Sunday, but they all frankly admit that there is no Biblical authority for a first-day sabbath.

Roman Catholic Confessions

James Cardinal Gibbons, The Faith of our Fathers, 88th ed., pp. 89.
"But you may read the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, and you will not find a single line authorizing the sanctification of Sunday. The Scriptures enforce the religious observance of Saturday, a day which we never sanctify."
Stephen Keenan, A Doctrinal Catechism 3rd ed., p. 174.
"Question:  Have you any other way of proving that the Church has power to institute festivals of precept?
"Answer:  Had she not such power, she could not have done that in which all modern religionists agree with her-she could not have substituted the observance of Sunday, the first day of the week, for the observance of Saturday, the seventh day, a change for which there is no Scriptural authority."
John Laux, A Course in Religion for Catholic High Schools and Academies (1 936), vol. 1, P. 51.
"Some theologians have held that God likewise directly determined the Sunday as the day of worship in the New Law, that He Himself has explicitly substituted the Sunday for the Sabbath. But this theory is now entirely abandoned. It is now commonly held that God simply gave His Church the power to set aside whatever day or days she would deem suitable as Holy Days. The Church chose Sunday, the first day of the week, and in the course of time added other days as holy days."
Daniel Ferres, ed., Manual of Christian Doctrine (1916), p.67.
"Question: How prove you that the Church hath power to command feasts and holy days?
"Answer. By the very act of changing the Sabbath into Sunday, which Protestants allow of, and therefore they fondly contradict themselves, by keeping Sunday strictly, and breaking most other feasts commanded by the same Church.'
James Cardinal Gibbons, Archbishop of Baltimore (1877-1921), in a signed letter.
"Is Saturday the seventh day according to the Bible and the Ten Commandments? I answer yes. Is Sunday the first day of the week and did the Church change the seventh day -Saturday - for Sunday, the first day? I answer yes . Did Christ change the day'? I answer no!
"Faithfully yours, J. Card. Gibbons"
The Catholic Mirror, official publication of James Cardinal Gibbons, Sept. 23, 1893.
"The Catholic Church, . . . by virtue of her divine mission, changed the day from Saturday to Sunday."
Catholic Virginian Oct. 3, 1947, p. 9, art. "To Tell You the Truth."
"For example, nowhere in the Bible do we find that Christ or the Apostles ordered that the Sabbath be changed from Saturday to Sunday. We have the commandment of God given to Moses to keep holy the Sabbath day, that is the 7th day of the week, Saturday. Today most Christians keep Sunday because it has been revealed to us by the[Roman Catholic] church outside the Bible."
Peter Geiermann, C.S.S.R., The Converts Catechism of Catholic Doctrine (1957), p. 50.
"Question: Which is the Sabbath day?
"Answer: Saturday is the Sabbath day.
"Question: Why do we observe Sunday instead of Saturday?
"Answer. We observe Sunday instead of Saturday because the Catholic Church transferred the solemnity from Saturday to Sunday."
Martin J. Scott, Things Catholics Are Asked About (1927),p. 136.
"Nowhere in the Bible is it stated that worship should be changed from Saturday to Sunday .... Now the Church ... instituted, by God's authority, Sunday as the day of worship. This same Church, by the same divine authority, taught the doctrine of Purgatory long before the Bible was made. We have, therefore, the same authority for Purgatory as we have for Sunday."
Peter R. Kraemer, Catholic Church Extension Society (1975),Chicago, Illinois.
"Regarding the change from the observance of the Jewish Sabbath to the Christian Sunday, I wish to draw your attention to the facts:
"1) That Protestants, who accept the Bible as the only rule of faith and religion, should by all means go back to the observance of the Sabbath. The fact that they do not, but on the contrary observe the Sunday, stultifies them in the eyes of every thinking man.
"2) We Catholics do not accept the Bible as the only rule of faith. Besides the Bible we have the living Church, the authority of the Church, as a rule to guide us. We say, this Church, instituted by Christ to teach and guide man through life, has the right to change the ceremonial laws of the Old Testament and hence, we accept her change of the Sabbath to Sunday. We frankly say, yes, the Church made this change, made this law, as she made many other laws, for instance, the Friday abstinence, the unmarried priesthood, the laws concerning mixed marriages, the regulation of Catholic marriages and a thousand other laws.
"It is always somewhat laughable, to see the Protestant churches, in pulpit and legislation, demand the observance of Sunday, of which there is nothing in their Bible."
T. Enright, C.S.S.R., in a lecture at Hartford, Kansas, Feb. 18,1884.
"I have repeatedly offered $1,000 to anyone who can prove to me from the Bible alone that I am bound to keep Sunday holy. There is no such law in the Bible. It is a law of the holy Catholic Church alone. The Bible says, 'Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy.' The Catholic Church says: 'No. By my divine power I abolish the Sabbath day and command you to keep holy the first day of the week.' And lo! The entire civilized world bows down in a reverent obedience to the command of the holy Catholic Church."

Protestant Confessions

Protestant theologians and preachers from a wide spectrum of denominations have been quite candid in admitting that there is no Biblical authority for observing Sunday as a sabbath.

Anglican/Episcopal

Isaac Williams, Plain Sermons on the Catechism , vol. 1, pp.334, 336.
"And where are we told in the Scriptures that we are to keep the first day at all? We are commanded to keep the seventh; but we are nowhere commanded to keep the first day .... The reason why we keep the first day of the week holy instead of the seventh is for the same reason that we observe many other things, not because the Bible, but because the church has enjoined it."
Canon Eyton, The Ten Commandments , pp. 52, 63, 65.
"There is no word, no hint, in the New Testament about abstaining from work on Sunday .... into the rest of Sunday no divine law enters.... The observance of Ash Wednesday or Lent stands exactly on the same footing as the observance of Sunday."
Bishop Seymour, Why We Keep Sunday .
We have made the change from the seventh day to the first day, from Saturday to Sunday, on the authority of the one holy Catholic Church."

Baptist

Dr. Edward T. Hiscox, a paper read before a New York ministers' conference, Nov. 13, 1893, reported in New York Examiner , Nov.16, 1893.
"There was and is a commandment to keep holy the Sabbath day, but that Sabbath day was not Sunday. It will be said, however, and with some show of triumph, that the Sabbath was transferred from the seventh to the first day of the week .... Where can the record of such a transaction be found? Not in the New Testament absolutely not.
"To me it seems unaccountable that Jesus, during three years' intercourse with His disciples, often conversing with them upon the Sabbath question . . . never alluded to any transference of the day; also, that during forty days of His resurrection life, no such thing was intimated.
"Of course, I quite well know that Sunday did come into use in early Christian history . . . . But what a pity it comes branded with the mark of paganism, and christened with the name of the sun god, adopted and sanctioned by the papal apostasy, and bequeathed as a sacred legacy to Protestantism!"
William Owen Carver, The Lord's Day in Our Day , p. 49.
"There was never any formal or authoritative change from the Jewish seventh-day Sabbath to the Christian first-day observance."

Congregationalist

Dr. R. W. Dale, The Ten Commandments (New York: Eaton &Mains), p. 127-129.
" . . . it is quite clear that however rigidly or devotedly we may spend Sunday, we are not keeping the Sabbath - . . 'Me Sabbath was founded on a specific Divine command. We can plead no such command for the obligation to observe Sunday .... There is not a single sentence in the New Testament to suggest that we incur any penalty by violating the supposed sanctity of Sunday."
Timothy Dwight, Theology: Explained and Defended (1823), Ser. 107, vol. 3, p. 258.
" . . . the Christian Sabbath [Sunday] is not in the Scriptures, and was not by the primitive Church called the Sabbath."

Disciples of Christ

Alexander Campbell, The Christian Baptist, Feb. 2, 1824,vol. 1. no. 7, p. 164.
"'But,' say some, 'it was changed from the seventh to the first day.' Where? when? and by whom? No man can tell. No; it never was changed, nor could it be, unless creation was to be gone through again: for the reason assigned must be changed before the observance, or respect to the reason, can be changed! It is all old wives' fables to talk of the change of the Sabbath from the seventh to the first day. If it be changed, it was that august personage changed it who changes times and laws ex officio - I think his name is Doctor Antichrist.'
First Day Observance , pp. 17, 19.
"The first day of the week is commonly called the Sabbath. This is a mistake. The Sabbath of the Bible was the day just preceding the first day of the week. The first day of the week is never called the Sabbath anywhere in the entire Scriptures. It is also an error to talk about the change of the Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday. There is not in any place in the Bible any intimation of such a change."

Lutheran

The Sunday Problem , a study book of the United Lutheran Church (1923), p. 36.
"We have seen how gradually the impression of the Jewish sabbath faded from the mind of the Christian Church, and how completely the newer thought underlying the observance of the first day took possession of the church. We have seen that the Christians of the first three centuries never confused one with the other, but for a time celebrated both."
Augsburg Confession of Faith art. 28; written by Melanchthon, approved by Martin Luther, 1530; as published in The Book of Concord of the Evangelical Lutheran Church Henry Jacobs, ed. (1 91 1), p. 63.
"They [Roman Catholics] refer to the Sabbath Day, a shaving been changed into the Lord's Day, contrary to the Decalogue, as it seems. Neither is there any example whereof they make more than concerning the changing of the Sabbath Day. Great, say they, is the power of the Church, since it has dispensed with one of the Ten Commandments!"
Dr. Augustus Neander, The History of the Christian Religion and Church Henry John Rose, tr. (1843), p. 186.
"The festival of Sunday, like all other festivals, was always only a human ordinance, and it was far from the intentions of the apostles to establish a Divine command in this respect, far from them, and from the early apostolic Church, to transfer the laws of the Sabbath to Sunday."
John Theodore Mueller, Sabbath or Sunday , pp. 15, 16.
"But they err in teaching that Sunday has taken the place of the Old Testament Sabbath and therefore must be kept as the seventh day had to be kept by the children of Israel .... These churches err in their teaching, for Scripture has in no way ordained the first day of the week in place of the Sabbath. There is simply no law in the New Testament to that effect."

Methodist

Harris Franklin Rall, Christian Advocate, July 2, 1942, p.26.
"Take the matter of Sunday. There are indications in the New Testament as to how the church came to keep the first day of the week as its day of worship, but there is no passage telling Christians to keep that day, or to transfer the Jewish Sabbath to that day."
John Wesley, The Works of the Rev. John Wesley, A.M., John Emory, ed. (New York: Eaton & Mains), Sermon 25,vol. 1, p. 221.
"But, the moral law contained in the ten commandments, and enforced by the prophets, he [Christ] did not take away. It was not the design of his coming to revoke any part of this. This is a law which never can be broken .... Every part of this law must remain in force upon all mankind, and in all ages; as not depending either on time or place, or any other circumstances liable to change, but on the nature of God and the nature of man, and their unchangeable relation to each other."

Dwight L. Moody

D. L. Moody, Weighed and Wanting (Fleming H. Revell Co.: New York), pp. 47, 48.
The Sabbath was binding in Eden, and it has been in force ever since. This fourth commandment begins with the word 'remember,' showing that the Sabbath already existed when God Wrote the law on the tables of stone at Sinai. How can men claim that this one commandment has been done away with when they will admit that the other nine are still binding?"

Presbyterian

T. C. Blake, D.D., Theology Condensed, pp.474, 475.
"The Sabbath is a part of the decalogue - the Ten Commandments. This alone forever settles the question as to the perpetuity of the institution . . . . Until, therefore, it can be shown that the whole moral law has been repealed, the Sabbath will stand . . . . The teaching of Christ confirms the perpetuity of the Sabbath."

Sa pamamagitan ng mga pahayag na yan, mapapatunayan natin ngayon na ang lahat na nagtitipon na Iglesya ngayon (sa panahon natin) ay lumilihis at hindi sumusunod sa kung ano ang patotoo ng Bibliya.
Sabi ng Bibliya : "Sa Kautusan at sa patotoo, kung hindi nila sasabihin ito, tunay ngang walang ilaw sa kanila. " Isaias 8:20
 Ano ang aasahan natin sa hinaharap kung tayo ay hindi masunurin?
KAPARUSAHAN lang ang ating mapapala. Mateo 7:21-23
"Hindi lahat ang magsasabi sa Akin, Panginnon, Panginoon, ay papasok sa kaharian ng langit, kundi yaon lamang sumusunod sa kalooban ng aking Amang nasa langit. Marami ang magsasabi sa akin sa panahon iyon, Panginoon, Panginoon, di po ba sa Iyong pangalan nangaral po kami, at sa Iyong pangalan, nagpalayas kami ng mga dyablo, at sa Iyong pangalan, gumagawa kami ng mga himala? At sasabihin ko sa kanila, "Kailanmay, hindi ko kayo nangakikilala, lumayo kayo sa akin mapaggawa ng masama.
  Maliwanag ang sabi ng Bibliya, Hindi lahat na nagsasabing "BORN-AGAIN" o kaya'y Christian ay makakapasok sa kaharian N'ya. Kundi yaon lamang sumusunod sa kalooban ng Dios.
Ano ang Kalooban ng Dios? (Juan 14:15; Exodo 20:1-20) Ang kalooban ng Dios ay ang Kanyang mga KAUTUSAN. Paano natin sinusunod ang Kanyang kautusan? Mabuting intensyon ang mangaral, ang magpalayas ng dyablo, ang gumwa ng mga himala..Subalit kapag ikaw na gumgawa ng ganito ay sumusuway sa UTOS ng Dios..,ang mga gawaing ito ng pagpapabanal ay hindi garantiya na makapasok ka sa Kanyang kaharian.. (I Juan 4:2) Marami sa mga protestante ngayon, naniniwala naman "daw" sila kay LORD, nananalig naman "daw" sila kay JESUS kaya seguro okay na seguro yon di baga? Sa larangan ng Bibliya ang pagsampalataya ay kailangang may kaakibat itong pagsunod na kung ang isang samahan ay binabalewala ito ay sya namang ikakapahamak ng mga miyembro nito sa Impiyerno.. Marami sa atin mga matatanda ng miyembro sa ating mga inaatenan mga fellowship o mga churches, kung tanungin, kilala mo ba Si Jesus, sasagutin kang "Oo" kilala ko naman.. Kung tanungin mo ulit, Alam mo ba ang mga KAUTUSAN N'ya? Sasagutin ka ng ganito, "Wala na tayo sa UTOS nasa GRASYA na tayo at hindi na natin kailangan ang mga UTOS, UTOS na yan sa bagong Tipan...Ganun? Makabibliya ba itong mga katuwirang ito? "HINDI!" Ang Bibliya ay malinaw na nagsasabi na: "Ang nagsasabing kilala ko Siya, (Ang Panginoon) subalit sumusuway naman sa KANYANG mga Kautusan (Ang Sampung Utos) ay sinungaling at wala sa kanya ang katotohanan.
  Maaring worker ka ng inyong Simbahan, o matagal ka ng miyembro nito, ganunpaman kung ikaw ay masuwayin sa UTOS ng Dios, ang Bibliya ay may bansag sa iyo, ano? "SINUNGALING!"  at mawawala lamang ang iyong pagka sinungaling kung makikinig ka sa Salita ng Panginoon, sumusunod sa mga UTOS nito at magbago.                                    

       Pahayag 12:14 "Narito ang pagtitiyaga ng mga banal, Sila na nananatili sa mga UTOS ng Dios at nananampalataya kay JESUS." Ito ay maaring wake up call sa iyo kung saan ka man ngayon, It is about the high time to go back to the Bible, obey God in His LAW.

Maraming Salamat
BAPTIST CHRISTIAN ASSEMBLY
Mobile # 09489388198